Prodigal Magazine

Do You Want to Be Innocent or Relevant?

Here’s a question for you:

Could The Godfather, one of the most acclaimed films of all time, be made without the bad language.

Without the violence?

How much of the “bad” stuff could you take out, and still have a movie about the mob?

It will probably be an eternal debate among Christians.  How much is too much bad language?  How much violence and sex and sin and dirtiness is acceptable?  How worldly is too worldly for Christians to be?

On the other hand, we want to be “relevant.”  We fear that Christianity is becoming irrelevant to the culture at large.

It turns out, to be relevant, sometimes you have to get dirty.

Sweet, Innocent, Bland Art

If you let little kids draw or paint whatever they want, you’re bound to get a bunch of animals, superheroes, and lots of other things in bright colors.  If you ask kids to write a story, they’ll write stories about those things.

That’s because kids write and draw what they know.  Their worlds consist of ponies and fantasy heroes and cuteness.

You aren’t going to get anything that’s controversial,

Or provocative,

Or offensive.

It’s all going to be sweet and pure, and rather bland.  Kids’ art doesn’t provoke discussion, deep thought, outrage or self-reflection.  It will be the kind of art that parents are most proud of, but no one else will really take notice of.  It’s value is mostly sentimental.  Kids give me drawings all the time.  I keep a few of them.  Not that they’ll ever be worth anything, but because of the child who gave it to me.

Art Reflects the World We Know

Kids draw ponies and spaceships because that’s what their world consists of.  Their perspective is small, formed by cartoons and storybooks.  It hasn’t had time to form.  Whatever opinions they have about the “adult” world, they mostly parrot what their parents or teachers have told them.

You aren’t going to get The Godfather from a second grader.  It’s not part of their world.

Now that you are not seven years old, the world of seven-year-olds is probably not that important to you.  You don’t care about the things that you did then.  You have new, adult priorities, knowledge, wisdom, and goals.  You have insight into the world around you. Your perspective has widened.

Keep It Clean, Christians

Here’s the thing.  Go into a lot of corners of Christian culture, and there is a massive effort to keep things sweet, innocent and pure, to “protect” Christians, to keep us from being too “worldly,” to depict the world as a children’s cartoon with no problems at all.  Christians are terribly sensitive to being offended.  We don’t want to be around people who provoke deep thought with contrary opinions.  We want to listen to people we already agree with.  We want our culture, to be sanitary.

To put it another way, a lot of people want the Christian world to look like the world of seven-year-olds.  Pure, innocent, child-like, bland, lacking anything that would be controversial or provocative…or worth paying attention to.

Does Your Art Belong in a Motel?

And we wonder why Christianity is becoming more and more irrelevant.

The world is full of sin, darkness, doubt, sex, violence, and, yes, even swear words.  Those thing are relevant to the world.  It’s what people are thinking about.  The world is not sanitary.  It doesn’t look like a child’s bedtime story.

And good art, literature, film and music addresses the soaring highs and the deepest lows of human existence.  It’s not sanitary either.  Sanitary art goes in motel rooms and Christian book stores.  Tell me the last great piece of art you saw in a motel?  You can’t.  That’s the point of motel art.  It’s there, but it’s not there to really be seen.

If you want your life and your work and your voice to be relegated to motel rooms, and be so limited in relevance that only other Christians will take notice, play it safe.  Don’t provoke thought.  Keep it innocent.

But to make good art,

the kind of art that will make people pay attention,

you have to know your audience.  You have to relate to their problems.

You have to get your hands dirty.

What do you think?  If we’re going to touch the world, do we have to get our hands dirty, or is our primary job to keep ourselves insulated from the world?

[photo: Richard-G, Creative Commons]

About The Author

Matt Appling has been writing his blog, The Church of No People, since 2008. In that time, his writing has been featured and syndicated on numerous culture, leadership and spirituality sites. Matt has worked in ministry for ten years, and is a pastor and a teacher in the Midwest.

  • http://www.zenichka.com Zee

    So you’re saying we need to be right out there, swearing and having sex and using violence? Is that what “getting out hands dirty” means? So we can relate to the world around us?

    I am not so sure about it.

    On the other hand, I agree that we cannot live our lives in a Christian bubble with nice and comfortable lives of innocence and stuff.

    Yet… there’s gotta be a balance. We are in the world, yet called to be not of the world – otherwise, what can we offer the people we talk with?

    “The best way” or “THE Way”?

    • http://www.bethanysuckrow.com bethany

      I don’t think Matt is advocating that we swear, have wild sex, and use violence, and I think it’s a leap to even draw that conclusion. What he’s asking is why, in all forms of creativity, do Christians shy away from what is culturally relevant? There does need to be a balance in how we approach those subjects and employ them in our creative efforts, but to sanitize our art and our consumption of art so that we’re not “too worldly” often shelters us from the reality of those outside our subculture, and rids our art of its relevance to the very people we’re trying to reach. And in that case, what is the point of doing it – making art – at all?

    • http://www.thechurchofnopeople.com Matt @ The Church of No People

      Your second choice is what I’m getting at. When it comes to swearing and violence, we risk looking holier than thou. When we do not understand cultural references, we look disconnected.

      But most importantly, if we turn a blind eye to the actual violence, injustice, and ugliness of the world, in the interest of maintaining our comfortable little bubble, then we are not really Christians.

  • http://jeremystatton.com Jeremy Statton

    I recently watched Schindler’s List for the first time since it came out. The movie contains language, graphic violence, nudity and sex. I don’t believe the same story could be told without these things. Not just from a reality perspective, but also from a story telling perspective. The story is more powerful when you see the change Oskar Schindler goes through from start to finish. It makes me want to experience that same change. If Schindler had been a human rights activist and devout Christian from the beginning, it would not have been as powerful.

    The point is that some art uses these things to create shock. Some use it to tell an incredible story.

    • http://unknownjim.com Jim

      Couldn’t agree more Jeremy. I think the problem is that the line is blurred even more today between using art for shock value and art to tell an incredible story.

    • http://www.thechurchofnopeople.com Matt @ The Church of No People

      Don’t stories of incredible redemption have to descend into hell first? :) Great response, Jeremy.

  • http://www.tonyjalicea.com Tony J. Alicea

    I think it’s the tension between being part of the world and being indistinguishable from it. Because being a part of the world requires responsibility, many are afraid of it. We don’t trust ourselves (or others) to make good decisions when they get their hands dirty, so to speak.

    But we can only learn to make good decisions when we have options. If the options are all taken away from us, we’ll be drawing ponies and cowboys but secretly draw the bad stuff in our secret notebooks.

  • http://unknownjim.com Jim

    Isn’t there only like one swear word in the Godfather? I love that movie. Man, now I want to go watch it again :)

  • http://www.eileenknowles.com Eileen

    My son goes to a strict Christian school. He is 8yrs old and we live a in a very small town where there aren’t many options. He brought his Diary of A Wimpy Kid book to school last week and the kids hovered around him like he had dirty magazine…are you kidding me?? And Harry Potter…don’t even bring up the H word!

    The education at this school is superb but their strictness (especially when they hit high school age) concerns me and my husband. He most likely wont be going there when he hits junior high. Overly sheltered kids sometimes go a little wild when they get a little freedom when they head off to college. I know this from experience.

    • http://www.bethanysuckrow.com bethany

      Harry Potter is a great example, Eileen. My dad and several other members of the Baptist church I grew up in objected to it because the story used witchcraft, completely overlooking all the incredible examples of goodness and truth the story offers to kids. If we can’t engage what is culturally relevant and allow our kids to do so with what matters to their own peers, how will they be self-sufficient or confident in their beliefs as adults? It has to be done with caution and discretion, but I speak from experience when I say that hiding things from kids won’t stop them from pursuing it.

      • http://www.bringingcraftyback.net/ Keri

        Jesus Himself engaged the culture in the form of parables that were culturally relevant to the day and time. Although, He never did so in a way that glorified or exploited that which is not holy. Is it possible for us to find ways to do the same, without “sanitizing” or being inauthentic?

    • http://www.thechurchofnopeople.com Matt @ The Church of No People

      Interesting.
      And I like what Bethany says about condemning a story. It’s a fictional story! It was not so long ago that Huck Finn was banned in many places. I’d be willing to be there are still places it is not allowed to be read. Why? Worldliness? Racism? That’s the whole point of the book!

      And as for witchcraft, how about just educating kids on the difference between reality and fiction? Pretty sure every Disney movie ever has copious amounts of “witchcraft.”

  • http://paulinesthoughts.com Pauline Scott

    Jesus said to, “Be wise as serpents but innocent as doves.” You can know about evil without participating in it.

    However Colossians 3:8 is very explicit about the use of “bad language.” “But now you must also rid yourselves of all such things as these: anger, rage, malice, slander, and filthy language from your lips.”

    You can use the bad language, but you can’t call it pleasing to God. I don’t know how you could make a movie relevant and not use it.

    When the Bible said that Peter swore when he denied Christ, he was taking an oath using God’s name. It described what he did without quoting him directly.

    There are many passages in the Bible that would be rated X if they were to be made into a movie. (The concubine who was attacked all night by the men of the city, her master cuts her body into parts and sends them throughout the country to warn others as a very vivid example.)

    The Bible even there describes what happened to the person without going into explicit details of the acts.

    Our personal relevance comes from relationships with those who don’t live a Christian life. Jesus hung around with the “sinners” of his day. I don’t see him using the bad language, though.

    The Godfather movie might not be as good of a movie without the language, but did it make people want to go out and make changes in their life after seeing it? (This is a real question as I have not seen the movie.)

    If a movie is realistic, and people like it, is that enough for art? I think art should have an influence, a purpose. The motel art is there to make a room comfortable for sleeping. It serves a purpose as bland as it may be.

    A movie or book should make people walk away from it changing the way they thought about something, or even to cause action by the person who saw it. Entertainment for its own sake is a fairly empty form of art in my opinion.

    • http://www.thechurchofnopeople.com Matt @ The Church of No People

      First of all, I think there are “swear” words, and then there are the words that offend God even more – lies, taking God’s name in vain, gossip, etc.

      Second, Jesus is not recorded “swearing,” but I don’t think he would’ve been shocked by it either.

      About your assertion – is it possible for people to have their point of view changed every time they look at some art? (If it all was purposed for this?) I’m not outright saying you’re wrong, it just seems like a very lofty definition for art, when people seem to be very hard hearted in my opinion. :)

  • http://jasonandkelliwoodford.blogspot.com/ kelliwoodford

    Wow! There are some really great thoughts in these comments already. Your subject really engages some hot dialogue.

    Without being specific on my personal convictions as to the ‘dirt’ of life, I think one thing is imperative for us as Christians. And that is to be holy as Jesus was holy.

    He was holy *internally* — set apart in His heart and mind unto His Father. His purity was not tainted by the unclean and sinful around Him. He touched the lepers and let the prostitutes dote all over Him. He met people in their mess and broke His heart over the pain of sin. And He didn’t cross the street away from the messy injured lying in the ditch. None of this was contrary to His Father’s heart toward ‘dirty’ mankind. Rather, He became *like us* — so He could relate to us — in every way. Except sin.

    If our holiness projects that we are somehow “above” others, it is not the holiness of Jesus. That would be more akin to the holiness of the Pharisees. Our holiness should never make us fearful of the sinfulness of others, but rather confident in the Love that conquers and compassionate as our Father is compassionate.

    Maybe this is being in the world, but not of it?

    Thanks for a great discussion.

  • http://redemptionsbeauty.com Shelly Miller

    The beauty of redemption is what captivates people, what gives them hope, what inspires transformation. And you can’t have redemption without the messy part of life in the story. I know for me personally, when I tell my story of growing up in home with an alcoholic mother who sold drugs and brought men home at night, it gives them hope. Because I am a pastors wife raising two teens and living in freedom. I guess that gives people hope that they can live that way too. Love, love, love this. It’s giving me courage to share my messy with the world.

  • http://www.familydeane.blogspot.com Hannah

    I find this topic really interesting. It’s something I think about lots ! I am what some people would class as a fairly liberal christian, I watch varied tv, and also love art. I think so much of it comes down to our hearts doesn’t it ? If a chrisitan artist/musician is walking with God, then their artwork will spring out of that place. at times this will be gritty, uncomfortable for some to look at and maybe not what some christians would want to look at. At other times it may be what could be classed as ‘holy’ or reflective of what lots of us class as christlike. I think being hard hitting, controversial and gritty for the sake of it, is dangerous ground. Some people are in a place with their walk with God that they need protection, and some time out of the grittiness of this world. Where others are in a position to get stuck in, wrestle with the good, the bad and the ugly. I seem to swing from sitting watching ‘the wire’ finding it deeply spitiural and causing me to run into god’s arms and pray, right through to wanting to run away, become Amish. I think most of us have a deep longing to be embedded and surrounded by things which reflect His holy ness, but have got to be prepared to get out hands dirty and when it’s right for us, connect with the pain, and gritty stuff.

  • http://theoldasdam.com Steve Martin

    I think that we can down to people’s levels, or move up to their level, to get to know them a bit, gain a bit of confidence from them. And then when the timing is right, when they show their pain and share their sorrows, we can hand them Christ and tell them what He has done for us, and for them.

    Thanks.

    Goodfellas may have been a better example than the Godfather.

    I love them both.

  • http://www.michaelvuke.wordpress.com Michael

    I agree with what I believe is what you were trying to say, Matt. I do think that Christian artforms shouldn’t shy away from the darkness in the world, and that violence, language, and sexuality all can be used and addressed.

    It all boils down to the spirit/intent behind it. Is it to glorify something dark, show darkness for what it is, teach a lesson, etc. We should never glorify darkness, but as Ted Dekker said, if Lord of the Rings replaced Sauron with a toothpick wielding turtle, good would not be shown as good.

    So I am totally fine with a Christian including language/violence/darkness/etc in their work. I do have a hard time seeing how explicit sexual content has a place; I can see how some sensual content has a place, but if someone starts throwing in sex scenes, I don’t know how that could fit appropriately. However, I don’t believe that is what you are advocating :)

    So, balance is key, and the motivation behind it is key. Sounds like every aspect of the Christian life to me!

    Good article.

  • Rizae

    I loved this post. I don’t think insulating ourselves from the world is a good idea at all. We were called to ‘be in the world but not of it.’ For instance, I know there has been Christian folk who don’t like the way my husband and I parent our kids. Don’t get me wrong – God is first, always first in our home. (God ‘radically’ saved me when I was 26 years old.) We talk about and discuss God and spiritual things in our home all the time. But, here’s the thing – we don’t shelter our kids from anything (unless of course it’s age inappropriate). They don’t live in a Christian utopia – they live in the world where sin seems to be escalating. As parents, we have lots and lots of discussions with our kids on a variety of subjects – we have to in this day and age, to equip them for what they will face.

    I have seen some kids so sheltered (adults too) that they are of no good when it comes to showing grace and mercy, and love to someone who is dying in their sin. I see more judgment with folk who shelter themselves from the world. How can anyone relate to anyone outside the body of Christ if they’ve never been exposed to it or have an idea of what it might be like to live in it. This is why we refused to send our kids to ‘Christian’ schools. “We are in the world, but not of it.”

    We are called to live a holy life not a secluded/isolated life. We are commanded to go out and preach the gospel. Cutting ourselves off from the world doesn’t make us holy … holiness is God’s doing no matter where we are or who we are. Cutting ourselves off from the world would make us so different that we wouldn’t even now how to relate to someone outside the body of Christ, who for instance, parties hard every weekend and swears like crazy, who does things we would never consider doing.

    How effective are we at reaching lost souls if we can’t even relate to them. Being righteous in a worldly way (abiding by the dos and don’ts) and or being isolated from the world is not an attractive thing to someone not in Christ … it sure wasn’t for me when I used to be one.

    We choose to be relevant.

    • Carlee

      I love this comment and really think you understood the whole sense of this blog post. I don’t think it’s really about the swearing, but about the battle of being in the world but not being of the world. I really like how you dissected this. Thank you!

  • http://www.cross-platform.org John

    I think I understand what you’re saying, but the assumption you’re working from – that in order to be relevant to the world we have to get into the grit and grime of the world around us – is false.

    I don’t know if I could disagree more, Matt. Christ was far more relevant to the world and people around him than most of us will ever be and he didn’t lower himself to the standards of the world. True, He spent time with the undesirables of the day and was controversial on many topics. But He never took part in the way you seem to be suggesting we should. This is the fine line of being “in the world but not of the world”. Not saying it’s easy, but we have to remain set apart. We cannot conform to the pattern of this world (Romans 12:2).

    • http://www.thechurchofnopeople.com Matt @ The Church of No People

      Take it this way – Jesus constantly did things which would have made him ceremonially unclean – healing a leper, healing a bleeding woman, touching a corpse.

      If your faith tells you that you must avoid witnessing to people because they are unclean, than it is not the way of Christ. We should not be shocked at the ugliness of the world. We should be wading into it, and trust God.

      • http://www.cross-platform.org John

        Yes, Christ did some things that flew in the face of established religious law and tradition. He was establishing a new covenant between God and Man though. And He didn’t do the things He did with relevance as the goal – Christ ministered to the people who needed Him simply because they needed Him.

        I’m not suggesting we can’t minister or witness to people who don’t conform to the “Christian ideal” (if such a thing truly exists), or that we should sequester ourselves away from the ugliness of the world. Quite the opposite. I’m saying that we need to be a true reflection of Christ to the world around us, and appropriating the habits and grit of the world for the sake of relevance is not how to do that.

  • http://www.somuchshoutingsomuchlaughter.com/ suzannah | the smitten word

    i’m not all that convinced that relevance is a worthy aim. truth is what i long for, and Truth is who Jesus claimed to be. christians favor “whatever is pure” over “whatever is true,” and our witness rings false, which is why a band like mumford & sons resonates more for many than much of what comes out of the “christian” industry.

    we do a disservice to ourselves (and youth, especially) when we fail to teach discernment. how do we engage the media and the world? do we put things in careful Good/Bad (false) categories, or do we test everything, actively engaging the whole of life through a Kingdom lens? we need not be afraid, but we can’t be passive consumers (or weak creators), either.

    we serve a God who is making all things new, and secular is a false category we’ve created to protect ourselves. we don’t need to “get dirty” per se, but we are called to discomfort, truth-telling, and the messy, holy work of redemption.

  • http://www.prodigalmagazine.com/speaking-up/ Emily

    Hi Matt,

    Great post! Two quotes from great artists have informed my view that art must capture all of life, not just the pretty or clean parts.

    Flannery O’Connor wrote much about writing, art, and faith. I can’t find the exact quote, but she wrote several essays and lectures on the importance of truth in art. “The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.” and “The basis of art is truth, both in matter and in mode.” When we are seeking truth in art, it is not always polite or pretty and we are foolish to attempt to make it so.

    Art does the grand job of lifting and celebrating the human spirit, but it is also steeped in the reality of the world, in a world where there is much mire. To ignore that mire is to ignore reality. For he mature person, art which fails to reflect reality will always appear trite and insufferable.

    The other quote I love is by John Ruskin, who wrote, “The demand for perfection is always a misunderstanding of the ends of art.”

    Seek truth, not perfection. Even if it is messy.

  • http://adonaisemperfi.blogspot.com/ Dave Harvey

    I don’t think it’s necessarily an “either/or” proposition. Who says you can’t be both? Jesus was “in the world” (i.e., relevant), but he was not of the world (he was innocent). He hung with prostitutes and tax collectors, yet I can’t imagine that he stooped to their level in his speech or actions – rather, he elevated them to a higher level by reminding them of their worth as Children of God.

    The question the writer asks is a leading one: “If we’re going to touch the world, do we have to get our hands dirty, or is our primary job to keep ourselves insulated from the world?”

    I don’t think too many people would say we should keep ourselves “insulated from the world,” so the only alternative he gives is, apparently, “to get our hands dirty.” But is that really the only option available? Jesus tells us to let our “light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven.”

    But that doesn’t mean that we have to be a disco ball.

  • Pingback: Royal privacy privilege and why page 3 should go | broken cameras & gustav klimt

  • http://www.tandemingtroll.blogspot.com tandemingtroll

    The Bible is full of people who have unhappy endings and unresolved conflicts and there are definitely some parts of it that are “R” rated (we have yet to read “Hosea” as part of our family Bible study). I thought that the movie “Veggie Tales: Jonah” was brilliant because it ended with Jonah whining about wanting to die because God saved the Assyrians and pointing out that even prophets don’t always “get” God. So, as Christians, we shouldn’t have all our art or fiction reach resolution in neat, clean, beautiful packages. Our art and our stories should not be colored in pastel colors without even a jot of darkness or a slash of vivid color. Even the brightest among us had darkness, except for Jesus.

    However, we shouldn’t seek shock value and we shouldn’t revel in the darkness. We should expose it as God’s light exposes us and we should unabashedly point out our darkness only to demonstrate God’s light and compassion.
    If this is what you are proposing, then I wholeheartedly agree with you.

  • http://inkyjazz.com Bridget

    The Bible is a good example of relevance, wouldn’t you say? God doesn’t mince words. He tells it like it is. There’s every evil under the sun. But it’s never magnified to titillate nor emphasized to entertain. It’s never celebrated or glorified.

    We see evil from God’s point of view. It’s never the main event. Never the end of the story. The glory of God always take center stage and always has the last word.

  • Yolanda Fay

    Thank you for saying this. I agree with you, and this topic is something I struggle with daily. I am a teacher and often question whether I should enforce stricter moral behavior in my classroom, and risk alienating the hearts I’m trying to impact, or accept my students as they are (with some flawed wordly paradigms) and hopefully connect to them in a way that will ultimately influence them for the better. I don’t know if I have an answer, but I’m glad I’m not the only one who questions the innocence/relevance dichotomy. I’ve had many encounters with the church’s black and white ideas about life; ideas that are generally constructed in a flawed Biblical context.

    The idea of “swear words” becomes complicated when you take into account the arbitrary nature of language and the fact that the same word might mean something non-offensive in another part of the world. Or it’s development and change over time. Language is man-made and not absolute. Like you mentioned in a comment reply, it is the meaning behind our words that God really cares about. I hear many Christians say very hateful things with lovely sugar coated words who then revile against a single drop of the F bomb regardless of why it is said. You made some wonderful points that I think all Christians should ponder, especially in light of our rapidly deteriorating cultural image. We have become “too good” to associate with the lost that we are commanded to love.

  • Pingback: Innocent or Relevant? | The Church of No People

  • Allie

    Wow so many comments. I am all for being culturally relevant so long as you don’t disobey the Bible and still honour God.
    Also – I think people should express their culture and background… I have seen christians try to be ;revenant’ for example swear in church, or paint some ‘edgy’ art work, and it is embarrassing because they are from nice Christian backgrounds, and you can tell that is not who they are and they are trying to hard. But get a dude into the church who is a believer with a gang background who does some amazing art or uses language that could be considered swearing or controversial ; and that is okay and it is expressing himself…….

    If you are a nice Christian with a conservative background just be that and save everyone the embarrassment of trying to hard to be ‘relevant’. but if you come from a war town country and so paint pictures of what you have seen, or talk harshly than do it, in line with how you are being redeemed by Jesus….. and always do it in love (gentleness, patience, kindness, not causing anyone to rumble..

  • Caitlin vH

    Hi Matt, Jesus didn’t have to conform to the ways of this world for him to do his work on earth! It specifically says in Romans 12:2 ‘Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.’
    So I understand what you’re saying, and that we shouldn’t act holier than thou around non-Christians, but wouldn’t it be far more effective (and closer to God’s will) for us to stand out from the world with our Christ-like ways??
    I think we would just confuse them all if we started behaving like them and then tried to tell them they’re living wrong :/

  • http://leiacellaa23.blogspot.com Melissa Jones

    I think you’re talking about a couple of different things here:
    1) It being ok to _be_ a “little” worldly in order to be “relevant” (which I disagree with – even a small bit of leaven ruins the whole batch)

    2) That we as believers sometimes think that the world should act like they’re all Christians. We’ve somehow got this entitlement mentality about _we’re_ believers, so _you_ (who are not) should “act right” around us. Instead, we should be training ourselves and our children that the world is a dark place. In darkness, it’s hard to get something clean, and frequently dark places are scary (although there can be beauty in the dark as well). But _we_ are the light of the world. Whenever light shines in the darkness, it exposes dirty things. Think of walking through the proverbial TV dark alley at night with just a flashlight. You’d see rats scurrying, there’d be dirt and grime, you might come upon violence or crime, etc. We should _expect_ that our presence will expose the sin in the world around us, and for that, people may not like us. We should _not_ expect that our little Christian bubble will shield us from those things, but at the same time, there’s no reason to toss our innocent children out into that unprepared. Also, our churches should be “home base” for believers. A safe haven where we attempt (for we are all still sinners) to live as God intends for us to live. There should be so much light present that dirt has no place to hide. The hidden/dirty parts of myself should be exposed by others coming alongside me and encouraging me to get clean. And my light should expose the hidden/dirty parts of others (iron sharpening iron).

    3) As for art….as others and you have said, you can’t show redemption without showing something that the redeemed need to be saved from. It’s gotta get bad before it can get good. For all its poor acting, I think “Second Chance” (the movie with Michael W. Smith) is a great example of “Christian” media that shows violence, etc. and redemption. So is “Courageous” (although I spent that entire movie wondering why they set it in Albany, NY when clearly EVERYONE had a southern accent – who knew there was an Albany, GA?). I think the more pressing question is “why are these movies so poorly acted and have such low production values?” Not so much “Do these movies contain enough violence, etc. to be ‘relevant?’”

    4) I think the real problem here is a misunderstanding of what “evangelism” is and isn’t. We want to be seen as “cool” so that everyone wants to be like/with us. So we become “relevant” and drink and curse and dabble in the world. I think instead, we are called to be so _different_ from the world that they begin to wonder why we’re different (a city on a hill)….not why we’re the same.

  • Abby Normal

    My husband is an artist and we’ve had a lot of discussions about stuff like this over the years.

    One of the things his art professors harped on a lot (from what he tells me) is that if you want to make really great art, you can’t make your “agenda” your #1 priority. You have to concentrate on putting as much effort, creativity, and quality into your piece above all else, and not concentrate on beating the viewer over the head with your “message”.

    I think that’s the great failing with modern Christian “art”–it seems like the focus is more on producing something that will “have a Godly message” or convert people or make Christians feel content and non-threatened. The message, or more like the attempt at conveying the message, has become more important than making something unique and creative.

    Once in a while I read the reviews of the “Left Behind” books over at Slacktivist, and these things are a perfect example. The guys that wrote these books either don’t know or pay no attention to concepts of what actually makes a “good” book–plotting, characterization, creative phrasing, etc. I can’t imagine a non-right-wing-Christian actually reading one of these without doing it for the irony. And these guys are apparently hosting writing workshops now!

    It’s no different from a freshman art student throwing some garbage at a wall in order to make a “statement” about something or other. It’s lazy and counterproductive–no one’s mind is going to be changed by crappy art.

    To me, the creative process itself, and not the product, is a way of glorifying God–therefore the focus should be on doing the best possible job that you can, not on trying to make something that you *think* God would approve of.

    • http://about.me/gdthrasher Greg

      I served in the Navy with a guy who absolutely devoured the Left Behind books. He ordered them from Amazon as soon as they were available. He also had nothing but contempt for Christians and believed the only good thing about church was that it was a good place to pick up naieve chicks and “turn” them.

  • http://pastorbrianharrell.wordpress.com/ Brian Harrell

    We are commanded to be Holy, not relevant. We are the light that lights the darkness. We don’t contribute to it. We are to let our good works get peoples attention. Jesus told his disciples to go into the most pagan society on the planet when he left the earth – to change it and not be like it.

  • http://aparchedsoul.com Grayson Pope

    I’m not sure there’s anything wrong with using profanity and general “dirtiness” in art to make a point. Think about a movie of the Prodigal Son if it were made today. There would have to be scenes with foul language, drinking, and probably drug abuse to illustrate how lost the Son had become. But without those scenes the redemption and grace at the end wouldn’t make any sense. If used, it should be to transcend the brokenness of the world.

  • http://DavidHelmsBlog.com David Helms

    When then question is posed to me, I always go back to what I love most about Jesus. He was never afraid to get his hands dirty. Jesus way well known for hanging out with “notorious sinners” and prostitutes. Do you suppose those parties were thoroughly sanitized happy fests? I can guarantee that there was salty language and filthy jokes flying across the table, did Jesus get offended? I doubt it, they wouldn’t have wanted to hang out with him if he did. Another thought, he made gallons of wine for people that were already drunk.

    Was Jesus innocent? Absolutely! Was He relevant? Still to this day.

  • Larry B

    Really great job, Matt. I think you and I are on the same page when it comes to this kind of thing.

    As for my thoughts on this “swearing” discussion, I’m going to be honest. I use swear words all the time. I think it’s kind of a non-issue as far as God is concerned. What is far more important to me is how my words affect those around me. I definitely do not swear around certain people, because for some these words can have a negative effect.

    I often go out and drink with my coworkers. I’ll have a couple beers and use swear words sometimes. I don’t think these things prevent me from being a light into darkness. Being a goody-two-shoes who nobody wants to really talk to would prevent me from being a light into darkness, though, that’s for sure.

    While I am with them, I often take time to listen to their struggles and encourage them. I do not get drunk. I look into people’s eyes when they’re talking to me. I am very intentional about building relationship, and it often leads to them asking questions about my faith. I think these things have a whole lot more to do with being a light than avoiding the use of certain words and drinks.

    And as far as what Paul said in Scripture about filthy language, I’d like to point out that in Galatians 3:1 he uses a very inappropriate Greek word for that culture in that day. I learned that directly from my Greek professor at Bible college, one of the leading textual critics in the world. So there are two sides to that coin.

    All that to say, I agree that there is a balance we must find, but I think many Christians are leaning way too far on the side of ‘cleanliness’ instead of relevance. If you don’t want to use certain words or drink alcohol, that is perfectly fine, but that doesn’t mean that it is a sin or that it negatively affects our being a witness.

    Great post, Matt. Thanks for writing!

  • http://www.brandonclements.com Brandon Clements

    Totally agree Matt.

    This is exactly why I had to self-publish my novel Every Bush Is Burning. Not only do we expect real people to adhere to our morality–we expect the same from made up people! It really is quite sad. I believe I’m part of a generation that wants nothing to do with most Christian art because of it…we’re all standing around saying, “Nope, I don’t believe you.”

  • Marie Vogler

    I think the most important thing for us as Christians is to learn how to live in a broken world and acknowledge the brokenness of it. And then we must help pick up the pieces so our beliefs and our God can be reflected in them. We all know life is messy and ugly and painful and we do ourselves no favors by trying to hide from or deny that–we ourselves are subjected to or a part of it so often. But by striving to make ourselves part of the solution (which may include language, violence, and controversy), we can begin to reflect the real world in our art while still lifting others up in the midst of the brokenness through it.

    Great thoughts, thank you for sharing!

  • http://oneconfusedlady.blogspot.com/ Anokina Shahbaz

    Great post Matt! You bring up a wonderful point worth pondering over. This reminds me of the bible verse about being IN the world, but not OF it. Love the reference to motel art! LOL Thanks for sharing :)

  • Jeremy Wong

    Being in the world, doesn’t mean we have to be insulated from it.

    However, as we are both the all creative Artist’s individual masterpiece, and also His speckle of paint on his great canvass, which is not of this world, that is the art that should, will and can provoke the deepest thought in this “stained” world. Be it either in profound awe and desire, or in great offense that One can be so beautiful.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ruthiedean Ruthie Dean

    Amazing post. Thanks for writing!! I work in a Christian Publishing house and I’m sharing this post with my coworkers. We get so much flack for publishing anything even slightly controversial…